[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Impact Factor 2022: 1.4
Cite Score 2022: 2.1
SJR 2022: 0.347
SNIP 2022: 0.545
..
Publication Charge
►Publication Fee
..
In Press
 In Press Articles
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 11, Issue 1 (1-2020) ::
Caspian J Intern Med 2020, 11(1): 120-123 Back to browse issues page
Challenging case of Muscle Bridge; a 15-year follow-up of a patient
Hassan Aghajani , Kaveh Hosseini , Saeed Alizadeh , Reyhaneh Aghajani
Department of Cardiology, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , aghajanih@tums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (4174 Views)
Background: Anatomically myocardial bridging (MB) consists of either superficial myocardial fibers that traverse over the LAD or deep fibers that encircle the coronary artery. In this study, we present a patient with myocardial bridging, who was primarily diagnosed with coronary artery disease which did not properly respond to full-dose medical treatment but benefited from coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).
Case presentation: In 2017, a 53-year old man was referred to Tehran Heart Center (THC) with complaint of typical chest pain (TCP). In 2003 he had TCP and underwent coronary angiogram (CAG), due to positive non-invasive tests. Muscle-bridge in LAD was diagnosed. In 2007, he was symptomatic and another CAG was done, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting was performed. In 2008 he became symptomatic and his interventionist, decided to perform another CAG. At that time, he had CABG. He was asymptomatic until 2015, he referred to us with the same TCP and we decided to perform CAG for the fourth time. After two years, again another PCI was done due to in-stent restenosis.
Conclusion: Revascularization should be considered in MB refractory to medical treatment. However, coronary perforation, in-stent restenosis and graft failure are major concerns.
Keywords: refractory myocardial bridging, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft, in-stent restenosis, graft failure
Full-Text [PDF 223 kb]   (908 Downloads)    
Type of Study: case report | Subject: Cardiology
Received: 2019/02/9 | Accepted: 2019/06/24 | Published: 2020/04/18
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Aghajani H, Hosseini K, Alizadeh S, Aghajani R. Challenging case of Muscle Bridge; a 15-year follow-up of a patient. Caspian J Intern Med 2020; 11 (1) :120-123
URL: http://caspjim.com/article-1-1763-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 11, Issue 1 (1-2020) Back to browse issues page
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645