دوره 10، شماره 3 - ( 3-1398 )                   جلد 10 شماره 3 صفحات 313-309 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها


XML English Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tajeddin F, Esmaeilnejadganji S M, Baghiani Moghaddam B, Kamali Ahangar S, Bahrami feridoni M. Percutaneous pinning versus pin-in-plaster for treatment of distal radius fractures. Caspian J Intern Med 2019; 10 (3) :309-313
URL: http://caspjim.com/article-1-1714-fa.html
Percutaneous pinning versus pin-in-plaster for treatment of distal radius fractures. . 1398; 10 (3) :309-313

URL: http://caspjim.com/article-1-1714-fa.html


چکیده:   (5123 مشاهده)
Background: Distal radius fractures constitute 17% of all fractures and 75% of forearm fractures in adults. Due to the vital role of the hands in a wide range of daily tasks, quick recovery and fewer complications for the patients are important. The purpose of this study was to compare the two common treatments of distal radius fractures namely, percutaneous pinning and pin-in-plaster.
Methods: An observational analytical cohort study was conducted on 74 patients with distal radius fracture treated with percutaneous pinning fixation and pin-in-plaster techniques. The patients, aged more than or equal to 18 years with unilateral, closed and unstable distal radius fractures were treated in Shahid Beheshti Hospital during 2007 to 2010.The data were entered into the SPSS Version 20 statistical software and analyzed by student’s t-test, one-way ANOVA and repeated measures test.
Results: Randomly, 31 patients were in pin-in-plaster group and 43 patients in percutaneous pinning group. The patients’ age range was 18-74 years. The average of radial inclination and palmar tilt after 6 weeks was significant (P=0.02, p<0.0001) in patients with percutaneous pinning. The performance of the patients after 3 and 12 months in both groups was significant (p=<0.0001).
Conclusion: This study revealed that in approach to unstable DRF in adults, PCP method shows better improvement compared to PP technique.
متن کامل [PDF 254 kb]   (922 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: Original Article |
دریافت: 1397/10/18 | پذیرش: 1398/2/16 | انتشار: 1398/5/5

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb