[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Impact Factor 2022: 1.4
Cite Score 2022: 2.1
SJR 2022: 0.347
SNIP 2022: 0.545
..
Publication Charge
►Publication Fee
..
In Press
 In Press Articles
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 6, Issue 2 (4-2015) ::
Caspian J Intern Med 2015, 6(2): 67-71 Back to browse issues page
Women’s satisfaction in early versus delayed postcaesarean feeding: A one-blind randomized controlled trial study
Shahnaz Barat , Sedigheh Esmaeilzadeh , Masoumeh Golsorkhtabaramiri , Soraya Khafri , Maryam Moradi Recabdarkolaee
Fatemezahra Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran. , sesmael@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (7477 Views)

 Background: The early postoperative feeding after caesarean section (C- section) has remained controversial. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of early versus delayed postcaesarean section oral feeding regarding gastrointestinal complications and patients postoperative satisfaction after C- section.

 Methods: This clinical trial study was conducted on 200 pregnant women undergoing planned C-section under spinal anesthesia (Registration Number: IRCT: 138712211760N1). Women were randomly divided in two groups group A (early feeding group) comprised of 101 patients who were encouraged to take oral fluid. If they tolerated, they continue semi-solid and solid foods starting 2 h after caesarean section. Group B (delayed feeding group) comprised of 99 patients who were given oral fluid 8 h after surgery. After beginning of feeding the patients’ tolerance, first flatus, first defecation, beginning of regular diet, the length of hospital stay and also patient satisfaction level were evaluated in each group by visual scale analog (VAS).

 Results: The mean time of the first passage of flatus was 10.2±1.7 hours for the early oral feeding group versus 10.7±1.6 hours for the delayed feeding group and the difference was significant (P=0.03). Duration to first defecation and length of hospital stay as well as patient satisfaction level did not differ significantly between the two groups.

 Conclusion: The results of this study suggest early postcaesarean feeding. It is well tolerated and helps return normal feeding habits.

 

Keywords: Caesarean section, Satisfaction, Gastrointestinal, Feeding
Full-Text [PDF 448 kb]   (2124 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Obstetrics & Gynicology
Received: 2015/03/15 | Accepted: 2015/03/15 | Published: 2015/03/15
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Barat S, Esmaeilzadeh S, Golsorkhtabaramiri M, Khafri S, Moradi Recabdarkolaee M. Women’s satisfaction in early versus delayed postcaesarean feeding: A one-blind randomized controlled trial study. Caspian J Intern Med 2015; 6 (2) :67-71
URL: http://caspjim.com/article-1-501-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 2 (4-2015) Back to browse issues page
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645