[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Impact Factor 2022: 1.4
Cite Score 2022: 2.1
SJR 2022: 0.347
SNIP 2022: 0.545
..
Publication Charge
►Publication Fee
..
In Press
 In Press Articles
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 12, Issue 4 (Autumn 2021) ::
Caspian J Intern Med 2021, 12(4): 539-543 Back to browse issues page
Efficacy and safety of Intranasal Ketamine and Midazolam for sedation of young pediatric patients; a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
Hossein Khoshrang , Cyrus Emir Alavi , Siamak Rimaz , Ali Mirmansouri , Farnoush Farzi , Gelareh Biazar , Zahra Atrkarroushan , Nazanin Sabet Khadem
Anesthesiology Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Alzahra hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran , gelarehbiazar1386@gmail.com
Abstract:   (3208 Views)
Background: Pediatric patients feel significant fear and anxiety when undergoing surgeries. The ideal drug and its administration route have not been found yet. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intranasal (IN) ketamine and midazolam as premedication in children.
Methods: We studied 71 eligible pediatric patients undergoing elective urologic surgeries, aged 2 to 6 years. The degree of sedation and separation scores was compared between the two groups. Additionally, hemodynamic parameters, before premedication, after induction of anesthesia, and during surgery were documented and compared between two groups. Postoperatively, any side effect was recorded as well.
Results: Finally, the data from 71 children were analyzed.  Recovery time was significantly longer in group K (ketamine) compared to group M (midazolam); 27.86±4.42 vs 38.19± 6.67 minutes respectively (P=0.01). No significant difference was observed in terms of sedation score between two groups of K & M; 3.29±0.78 vs 3 ±0.71 respectively (P=0.17), and not regarding separation score; 2.51±0.61 & 2.31 ±0.52 respectively (P=0.01). Vital signs were kept within the physiological limits in both groups with no marked fluctuations.
Conclusion: To produce sedation in young children, both midazolam and ketamine were effective and safe by IN route.
Keywords: Ketamine, Midazolam, Intranasal, Pediatrics, Sedation
Full-Text [PDF 262 kb]   (873 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Anesthesiology
Received: 2020/09/8 | Accepted: 2020/12/26 | Published: 2021/09/19
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khoshrang H, Emir Alavi C, Rimaz S, Mirmansouri A, Farzi F, Biazar G, et al . Efficacy and safety of Intranasal Ketamine and Midazolam for sedation of young pediatric patients; a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Caspian J Intern Med 2021; 12 (4) :539-543
URL: http://caspjim.com/article-1-2490-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 12, Issue 4 (Autumn 2021) Back to browse issues page
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 40 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645