[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Impact Factor 2022: 1.4
Cite Score 2022: 2.1
SJR 2022: 0.347
SNIP 2022: 0.545
..
Publication Charge
►Publication Fee
..
In Press
 In Press Articles
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 10, Issue 1 (1-2019) ::
Caspian J Intern Med 2019, 10(1): 11-15 Back to browse issues page
Can the kidney volume help to differentiate the types of rejection before biopsy?
Mohammad Yazdani , Nasser Ghaemian , Soraya Khafri , Farshid Oliaei
Cellular and Molecular Biology Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , ol_1964@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (5432 Views)
Background: The aim of this study was to use the volume of the graft as an adjunct tool for better decision making.
Methods: Kidney transplanted patients with acute azotemia and documented volume and finally a biopsy were enrolled in this study‌. Graft volumes between rejected patients (antibody-mediated rejection {AMR} and cell - mediated rejection {CMR}) and ‌non rejected but azotemic patients were compared.
Results: A total of 76 patients were enrolled in this study ‌(45 case and 31 control‌). 53.3% of the case group were‌ (AMR)‌ and 46.7% belonged to ‌(CMR). There was no difference between kidney volume according to age or sex. But the case group had a significantly bigger volume than controls (253.09 cm3 and 186.45 cm3; p< 0.001). In addition, there was a significant difference between the volumes of AMR kidneys with CMR and controls ‌(286.24+66.70‌, 224.08+76.79 and 186.95+39.92; P=0.003 and p<0.001, respectively), but not between CMR and controls ‌(P=0.067). A cutoff point of 200 cm3 was determined as rejection with sensitivity and specificity of 70% and a cutoff point of 250 cm3 could be used as AMR cut off with sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 70%.
Conclusion: There was a significant difference in volume between rejection and control group and between AMR and CMR. So, kidney volume determination is an easy and valuable tool to help the clinician to have a more rapid and better decision making.
Keywords: Keywords : Kidney transplantation, kidney volume, AMR, CMR, Ultrasonography
Full-Text [PDF 274 kb]   (1111 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Nephrology
Received: 2018/01/8 | Accepted: 2018/08/6 | Published: 2018/10/28
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Yazdani M, Ghaemian N, Khafri S, Oliaei F. Can the kidney volume help to differentiate the types of rejection before biopsy?. Caspian J Intern Med 2019; 10 (1) :11-15
URL: http://caspjim.com/article-1-1358-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 10, Issue 1 (1-2019) Back to browse issues page
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 40 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645