[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Impact Factor 2022: 1.4
Cite Score 2022: 2.1
SJR 2022: 0.347
SNIP 2022: 0.545
..
Publication Charge
►Publication Fee
..
In Press
 In Press Articles
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 10, Issue 3 (6-2019) ::
Caspian J Intern Med 2019, 10(3): 309-313 Back to browse issues page
Percutaneous pinning versus pin-in-plaster for treatment of distal radius fractures
Farhang Tajeddin , Seyyed Mokhtar Esmaeilnejadganji , Behnam Baghiani Moghaddam , Sekineh Kamali Ahangar , Masood Bahrami feridoni
Cancer Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , Dr bahrami865@gmail.com
Abstract:   (4883 Views)
Background: Distal radius fractures constitute 17% of all fractures and 75% of forearm fractures in adults. Due to the vital role of the hands in a wide range of daily tasks, quick recovery and fewer complications for the patients are important. The purpose of this study was to compare the two common treatments of distal radius fractures namely, percutaneous pinning and pin-in-plaster.
Methods: An observational analytical cohort study was conducted on 74 patients with distal radius fracture treated with percutaneous pinning fixation and pin-in-plaster techniques. The patients, aged more than or equal to 18 years with unilateral, closed and unstable distal radius fractures were treated in Shahid Beheshti Hospital during 2007 to 2010.The data were entered into the SPSS Version 20 statistical software and analyzed by student’s t-test, one-way ANOVA and repeated measures test.
Results: Randomly, 31 patients were in pin-in-plaster group and 43 patients in percutaneous pinning group. The patients’ age range was 18-74 years. The average of radial inclination and palmar tilt after 6 weeks was significant (P=0.02, p<0.0001) in patients with percutaneous pinning. The performance of the patients after 3 and 12 months in both groups was significant (p=<0.0001).
Conclusion: This study revealed that in approach to unstable DRF in adults, PCP method shows better improvement compared to PP technique.
Keywords: Distal radius fracture, Percutaneous pinning, Pin in plaster, Fracture
Full-Text [PDF 254 kb]   (861 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Orthopedy
Received: 2019/01/8 | Accepted: 2019/05/6 | Published: 2019/07/27
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tajeddin F, Esmaeilnejadganji S M, Baghiani Moghaddam B, Kamali Ahangar S, Bahrami feridoni M. Percutaneous pinning versus pin-in-plaster for treatment of distal radius fractures. Caspian J Intern Med 2019; 10 (3) :309-313
URL: http://caspjim.com/article-1-1714-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 10, Issue 3 (6-2019) Back to browse issues page
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 40 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645