[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Impact Factor 2022: 1.4
Cite Score 2022: 2.1
SJR 2022: 0.347
SNIP 2022: 0.545
..
Publication Charge
►Publication Fee
..
In Press
 In Press Articles
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 11, Issue 1 (1-2020) ::
Caspian J Intern Med 2020, 11(1): 100-104 Back to browse issues page
Rate of urinary tract infection after urodynamic study in pelvic floor clinic
Zinat Ghanbari , Fedyeh Haghollahi , Tahere Eftekhar , Tahere Forooghifar , Mamak Shariat , Maryam Hajihashemy , Mohsen Ayati
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , hajhashemy73@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (6257 Views)
Background: One of the complications of urodynamic study is urinary tract infection. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of urinary tract infection (UTI) after UDS in patients referred to the pelvic floor clinic with regard to the specific conditions of these patients, such as presence of pelvic organ prolapse and high post voiding residual volume (PVR).
Methods: In a prospective descriptive-analytic study, 146 female candidates for UDS from January 2016 to June 2017 entered the study. Patients were examined for urinary tract infection before UDS (up to 5 days before USD) and were enrolled in the study if they did not have bacteriuria or urinary tract infection. Patients did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis before performing UDS. The patients were asked to do U/A and U/C three days after the UDS test.
Results: Among the 146 patients, 9 (6.2%) patients had considerable bacteriuria and 7 (4.8%) patients had UTI. The mean maximum detrusor pressure during urination and abnormal PVR before UDS had a significant correlation with positive urinary cultures after UDS (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The results showed that this diagnostic procedure is low risk and the prophylactic antibiotic therapy is not required before UDS in pelvic floor clinic. It seems that prophylactic antibiotic therapy is only appropriate in case of PVR greater than 50 ml and possibly of the high detrusor pressure.

 
Keywords: urinary tract infection, pelvic floor, Urodynamic Study
Full-Text [PDF 321 kb]   (1062 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Short Communication | Subject: Obstetrics & Gynicology
Received: 2019/02/24 | Accepted: 2019/07/31 | Published: 2019/12/17
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghanbari Z, Haghollahi F, Eftekhar T, Forooghifar T, Shariat M, hajihashemy M et al . Rate of urinary tract infection after urodynamic study in pelvic floor clinic. Caspian J Intern Med 2020; 11 (1) :100-104
URL: http://caspjim.com/article-1-1781-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 11, Issue 1 (1-2020) Back to browse issues page
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 40 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645