[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Impact Factor 2022: 1.4
Cite Score 2022: 2.1
SJR 2022: 0.347
SNIP 2022: 0.545
Publication Charge
►Publication Fee
In Press
 In Press Articles
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 13, Issue 1 (Winter 2022) ::
Caspian J Intern Med 2022, 13(1): 84-89 Back to browse issues page
Rectal vs. sublingual misoprostol in cesarean section: three‑arm, randomized clinical trial
Fatemeh Zahra Bagheri , Mahboobeh Azadehrah , Bizhan Shabankhani , Hooshang Akbari , Ebrahim Nasiri Ferami
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran , bagheri.z1994@gmail.com
Abstract:   (2302 Views)
Background: Misoprostol is a myometrial stimulant with uterotonic properties and can be administered rectally, vaginally, or sublingually. Numerous studies have investigated the effect of misoprostol on the prevention and treatment of PPH (postpartum hemorrhage) after vaginal delivery, but its use to control PPH during cesarean section has not been widely studied.
Methods: In this clinical trial study, 180 pregnant women who were candidates for cesarean section were included in the study. They were divided into 3 groups of 60 people (sublingual misoprostol group, rectal misoprostol group, control group). In all three groups, the volume of blood lost was recorded in the checklist at the end of surgery. Data were entered into SPSS software and analyzed.
Results: The mean bleeding in the control group was 225.4±63.9, while it was 137.9±33.8   and 118.9±28.5 in the sublingual misoprostol group and rectal misoprostol group, respectively. We had significantly more bleeding in the control group (p<0.001) compared to the other two groups.
Conclusion: These results confirm the positive effect of misoprostol in reducing bleeding and show the superiority of using rectal misoprostol compared to other methods of reducing bleeding during cesarean section.
Keywords: misoprostol, rectal administration, sublingual administration, cesarean section, bleeding
Full-Text [PDF 180 kb]   (826 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Obstetrics & Gynicology
Received: 2020/10/5 | Accepted: 2021/03/17 | Published: 2022/01/30
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Bagheri F Z, Azadehrah M, Shabankhani B, Akbari H, Nasiri Ferami E. Rectal vs. sublingual misoprostol in cesarean section: three‑arm, randomized clinical trial. Caspian J Intern Med 2022; 13 (1) :84-89
URL: http://caspjim.com/article-1-2540-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 13, Issue 1 (Winter 2022) Back to browse issues page
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 40 queries by YEKTAWEB 4639